Is about as polite a way of putting it as I can come up with. I fully expect that I’m not in possession of the full facts, this being the usual state of affairs, but both of the things that are concerning me seem to show a significant disconnect between sports administrators and the punters. The first one is a bit of an old chestnut that has raised it’s ugly head again. It seems that, following a meeting of GMs, the NHL, if it can’t find a way of making changes to the goalie’s equipment, it talking about changing the size of the goal. How can people so close to the game not realise what it is that attracts the paying public, and here’s a clue, it’s not the goal count. The powers that be in the NHL seem to think that every game should finish 6-5 and will trash the history of the game to get there. I watched a game between the Canucks and the Oilers the weekend before last and it had everything you could ask from a regular season game, commitment, speed, skill, line match ups and changes, great goal tending from Luongo, passion, hitting and until 46 seconds from the end, when all hell broke loose after an empty netter, it was 3-2 to the Canucks. But it didn’t matter whether the score at that point was 1-0 or 7-6. If they mess with the size of the goal then you have to draw a line under just about every record in the book and start again, and for what? People who just want to see the goals can watch highlights packages such as NHL On The Fly because arbitrarily changing a fundamental of the game is still not going to impact significantly on the revenue and the records of the greats of the past will have less and less relevance.
The other is something I have touched on before; Ducati and WSB. Just what sort of a lash up is WSB nowadays, control tyres (Italian), bending over backwards, so far that the only people who usually have such a view are proctologists, to accommodate one team Ducati (Italian) that all appearance equitable racing climbed out the window, ran down the road screaming and is now busy getting shit faced in the pub. I understand that there are the possibilities of technical changes to the Ducati such as limiting the diameter of the inlet tract and rev limiters and weight penalties, albeit up to only a max 6kg, which can be used to ‘handicap’ Ducati. And these ‘handicaps’ will be applied, presumably, by the promoters of the series FGSport (Italian). I haven’t been able to find out how these are to be applied but I don’t think it’s too outlandish to suggest that it will be somewhat arbitrary, how can it be otherwise? Will handicapping apply equally to the RS08 bikes as well as the factory F08 bikes, in race 2 RS08 bikes finished ahead of the F08? Three of the top four in race one and five of the top six in race two were Ducatis, is now the time to act with the handicapping? If so will all 1098 Ducatis be handicapped to finish 3rd, 9th, 17th? Which of the Ducatis gets penalised if, say, Reuben Xaus is feeling it at one meeting and gets a double victory by 8 and then 15 seconds but the next highest placed Ducati is 5th, will just Xaus be penalised for just being ‘on it’ that weekend, clearly not fair, this sort of thing happens reasonably regularly, or are all RS08s to be penalised or all 1098 Ducatis-equally inequitable. FGSport have cooked themselves up quite a dogs dinner and will inevitably choke on it. With the likes of Aprilia, BMW, KTM and Bimota looking to get into the championship in the next couple of seasons, two with fours and two with twins, this rules shit fest needs to be sorted now. Good luck with that, roll on the start of Moto GP and some real racing.